All tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

BOD Removal — First-Order Kinetics

First-order BOD removal in a continuously stirred reactor (CSTR) or plug-flow reactor (PFR). Applies to activated sludge basins, oxidation ponds, and trickling-filter effluent prediction. SI and US customary units.

mg/L
1/day
hours
°C (rate adjusted with θ-factor 1.04)
mg/L
%
1/day

Defaults: 200 mg/L influent BOD (medium-strength domestic), k = 0.25/day (typical activated sludge at 20°C), 6-hour aeration tank. Concentrations are unit-agnostic; θ in hours is consistent with k in 1/day via internal conversion.

Temperature correction (Arrhenius-type):
$$ k_T = k_{20} \cdot \theta^{(T - 20)}, \qquad \theta = 1.04 \text{ (BOD)} $$
CSTR steady state, first-order removal:
$$ S = \frac{S_0}{1 + k_T \tau} $$
PFR (plug flow), first-order:
$$ S = S_0 \, e^{-k_T \tau} $$
S0 influent BOD · S effluent BOD · kT first-order removal rate at temperature T · τ hydraulic detention time (= V/Q).

CSTR vs PFR — when to use which

Plug-flow reactors are mathematically equivalent to a long thin pipe where each fluid parcel ages in sequence. They give the highest treatment efficiency for first-order kinetics at a given detention time. Real long-rectangular aeration basins approach plug-flow behavior, especially with serial baffles.

CSTR (completely mixed) reactors assume instantaneous mixing — every parcel sees the effluent concentration. They tolerate shock loads better but require more volume than PFR for the same effluent quality. Most circular activated-sludge basins, oxidation ditches, and SBRs in fill-and-react mode behave as CSTR.

The ratio between CSTR and PFR volume needed for the same effluent S grows with kτ. At 90% removal, CSTR needs ~3.9× the PFR volume. Engineers exploit this by series-staging CSTRs (3-4 in series approaches PFR behavior) to gain efficiency.

Typical first-order rate constants

Temperature dependence

Biological reaction rates roughly double for every 10°C rise. The Arrhenius factor θ = 1.04 for BOD removal is the textbook value (Metcalf & Eddy). Some references use 1.05 for trickling filters and 1.07 for nitrification. Always check the design temperature — winter low-flow conditions often govern POTW design even though peak summer biomass is more dramatic.

Calibration vs design k

For an existing plant, back-calculate k from observed effluent quality at known temperature. For a new design, take k from a textbook range and apply a conservative factor of 0.7 to 0.8. The rate is sensitive to MLSS, mixing, aeration efficiency, and influent biodegradability — none of which are captured in a single k.

Reference: Metcalf & Eddy / AECOM (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, ch. 8. Tchobanoglous, G., et al. (2003). Wastewater Engineering, 4th ed., ch. 5.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real stormwater or hydraulics design problem per month, with the math worked out and the gotchas called out. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLY PE STAMP HERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com