All tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

Darcy-Weisbach Equation Calculator

Pipe head loss from friction. Friction factor is computed from Reynolds number and pipe roughness using the Swamee-Jain explicit form of the Colebrook equation.

in
ft
ft/s
in
ft²/s
ft

Defaults: 6-inch commercial steel water main carrying 5 ft/s, 500 ft long, water at 60°F.

$$ h_f = f \, \frac{L}{D} \, \frac{V^2}{2g} $$
Friction factor (Swamee-Jain, valid for 5×10³ ≤ Re ≤ 10⁸):
$$ f = \frac{0.25}{\left[ \log_{10}\!\left(\frac{\varepsilon}{3.7 D} + \frac{5.74}{Re^{0.9}}\right) \right]^2} $$
hf head loss · f Darcy friction factor · L pipe length · D pipe diameter · V mean velocity · g gravitational acceleration · ε absolute pipe roughness · Re Reynolds number · ν kinematic viscosity.

When to use Darcy-Weisbach

The Darcy-Weisbach equation is the dimensionally correct, fluid-and-temperature-aware way to compute pipe friction loss. It applies to any Newtonian fluid in any flow regime, in pipes of any roughness. For water-supply work in the typical pressure-and-temperature range, Hazen-Williams is the simpler shortcut — but Hazen-Williams is calibrated for water at common conditions and falls apart for hot water, low-Reynolds flow, or non-water fluids.

Absolute pipe roughness ε — full reference table

Roughness is the most uncertain parameter in Darcy-Weisbach for new pipe; for old pipe it dominates everything else. New-pipe values come from the Crane manual; aged values reflect 20–30 years of tuberculation, scaling, and biofilm.

Absolute roughness ε for common pipe materials
Material / conditionε (in)ε (mm)ε (ft)
Drawn tubing (copper, brass)0.0000590.00155×10⁻⁶
Glass0.0000590.00155×10⁻⁶
PVC, HDPE (new)0.0000590.00155×10⁻⁶
Commercial steel (new)0.00180.0461.5×10⁻⁴
Wrought iron0.00180.0461.5×10⁻⁴
Galvanized iron0.0060.155×10⁻⁴
Asphalted cast iron0.00480.124×10⁻⁴
Cast iron (uncoated, new)0.01020.268.5×10⁻⁴
Concrete pipe (smooth, precast)0.0120.301.0×10⁻³
Concrete pipe (rough, formed)0.123.01.0×10⁻²
Riveted steel0.036–0.360.9–9.03×10⁻³–3×10⁻²
Cast iron, aged 30 yr0.041.03.3×10⁻³
Cast iron, aged 40+ yr (tuberculated)0.10–0.502.5–12.58×10⁻³–4×10⁻²

Source: Crane Technical Paper No. 410, Flow of Fluids Through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe. Aged-pipe values from Lamont (1981) and field measurements summarized in AWWA M11.

Kinematic viscosity ν of water and common fluids

Kinematic viscosity for common fluids in pipe-flow problems
Fluid / temperatureν (US ft²/s)ν (SI m²/s)
Water, 40°F (4°C)1.66×10⁻⁵1.55×10⁻⁶
Water, 60°F (16°C)1.21×10⁻⁵1.13×10⁻⁶
Water, 70°F (21°C) — STD1.06×10⁻⁵9.84×10⁻⁷
Water, 80°F (27°C)9.30×10⁻⁶8.64×10⁻⁷
Water, 100°F (38°C)7.39×10⁻⁶6.87×10⁻⁷
Air, 60°F1.58×10⁻⁴1.47×10⁻⁵
SAE 10W oil, 60°F1.0×10⁻³9.3×10⁻⁵
Glycerin, 70°F6.5×10⁻³6.0×10⁻⁴

Worked examples

Example 1 — 8-inch new commercial steel pipe, 2000 ft, 1000 gpm

Given: D = 8 in, L = 2000 ft, Q = 1000 gpm, new commercial steel (ε = 0.0018 in), water at 60°F (ν = 1.21×10⁻⁵ ft²/s).
Find: Friction head loss hf.
D = 8/12 = 0.667 ft; A = π·(0.667)²/4 = 0.349 ft²
Q = 1000/448.83 = 2.228 cfs; V = 2.228/0.349 = 6.38 ft/s
Re = V·D/ν = 6.38·0.667/(1.21×10⁻⁵) = 3.52×10⁵ (turbulent)
ε/D = 0.0018/8 = 2.25×10⁻⁴
f = 0.25 / [log₁₀(2.25×10⁻⁴/3.7 + 5.74/(3.52×10⁵)0.9)]² = 0.25 / [log₁₀(6.08×10⁻⁵ + 6.45×10⁻⁵)]² = 0.0181
hf = 0.0181 · (2000/0.667) · (6.38)²/64.4 = 0.0181 · 2999 · 0.632
hf = 34.3 ft (over 2000 ft of pipe)

Example 2 — Laminar flow check (small-diameter chemical line)

Given: 1-inch line, V = 0.5 ft/s, glycerin at 70°F (ν = 6.5×10⁻³ ft²/s), L = 50 ft.
Find: Friction head loss.
D = 1/12 = 0.0833 ft; Re = 0.5·0.0833/(6.5×10⁻³) = 6.4 (LAMINAR)
f = 64/Re = 64/6.4 = 10.0
hf = 10.0 · (50/0.0833) · (0.5)²/64.4 = 10.0 · 600 · 0.00388
hf = 23.3 ft of glycerin

Kinematic viscosity for water

Water at 60°F (15.6°C) has ν ≈ 1.08 × 10⁻⁵ ft²/s (1.13 × 10⁻⁶ m²/s). At 40°F use 1.66 × 10⁻⁵ ft²/s; at 80°F use 0.93 × 10⁻⁵ ft²/s. Viscosity changes ~50% between 40°F and 100°F, which matters for laminar-flow calculations but is usually negligible for fully turbulent water-distribution work.

Reynolds number regimes

Reference: Crane Technical Paper No. 410, Flow of Fluids Through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe. Swamee, P.K., Jain, A.K. (1976). "Explicit equations for pipe-flow problems." J. Hydraulic Div., ASCE, 102 (5), 657–664.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real stormwater or hydraulics design problem per month, with the math worked out and the gotchas called out. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLY PE STAMP HERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com