All tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

Heat Exchanger LMTD

Log mean temperature difference for heat-exchanger sizing. Counterflow and parallel-flow analytical solution. Required UA = Q / (F × LMTD), where F is the geometry correction factor (1.0 for true counterflow / parallel; less than 1 for shell-and-tube and crossflow).

°F
°F
°F
°F
Btu/hr (or W; for UA output)
°F
°F
°F
— (1.0 for cf/pf)
°F
Btu/(hr·°F)

Defaults: water-cooled steam condenser-style — hot 180→120°F, cold 60→100°F. Test that ΔT_2 > 0 (cold out < hot out) — otherwise temperature crossover means your geometry can't deliver this duty.

$$ \text{LMTD} = \frac{\Delta T_1 - \Delta T_2}{\ln(\Delta T_1 / \Delta T_2)} $$
Counterflow: ΔT1 = Th,i − Tc,o, ΔT2 = Th,o − Tc,i
Parallel: ΔT1 = Th,i − Tc,i, ΔT2 = Th,o − Tc,o
Required heat-transfer area:
$$ Q = U A \cdot F \cdot \text{LMTD}, \quad UA = \frac{Q}{F \cdot \text{LMTD}} $$
LMTD log mean temperature difference · F correction factor (Bowman charts, function of P and R) · U overall heat-transfer coefficient · A area · UA the design product.

Why LMTD, not arithmetic mean?

Heat transfer is proportional to ΔT instantaneously. As fluids exchange heat along the heat exchanger, ΔT changes — usually a lot. The simple arithmetic mean of inlet and outlet ΔT doesn't account for the curvature of the temperature profile. The integral ∫dq / ΔT(x) gives a logarithmic mean, hence LMTD.

For ΔT1/ΔT2 < 2, LMTD ≈ AMTD within 4%. For larger temperature differences, LMTD is significantly less than AMTD. Always use LMTD for design — using AMTD undersizes by 10–25%.

Counterflow is best

For the same approach temperatures, counterflow gives the smallest LMTD difference, which means the smallest required UA, which means the smallest heat exchanger. That's why all economically-sized heat exchangers are counterflow or close to it.

Parallel flow is rarely optimal. It's used only when:

F factor for shell-and-tube

Real heat exchangers are rarely true counterflow. Shell-and-tube has tube-side fluid making multiple passes through the same shell, mixing flow directions. The F factor — multiplied against LMTD — captures this. Bowman, Mueller, and Nagle (1940) charts give F vs P (effectiveness ratio) and R (capacity ratio).

This calculator uses approximate F formulas:

F < 0.75 is poor design — temperature crossover, requires larger or different geometry. Aim for F > 0.85.

Temperature crossover

If Tc,o > Th,o in a parallel-flow exchanger, you've requested impossible heat transfer (cold gets hotter than hot at exit). For counterflow this is permitted and is the source of efficiency. Watch for ΔT_2 ≤ 0 in the formulas — that's the tipoff.

Overall heat transfer coefficient U

U is the reciprocal of the sum of resistances: 1/U = 1/hi + Rfouling + (wall resistance) + 1/ho. Typical values:

Reference: Bowman, R.A., Mueller, A.C., Nagle, W.M. (1940). "Mean Temperature Difference in Design." Trans. ASME, 62. Cengel, Y.A., Ghajar, A.J. (2014). Heat and Mass Transfer, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, ch. 11.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real stormwater or hydraulics design problem per month, with the math worked out and the gotchas called out. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLY PE STAMP HERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com