All tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

V-Notch Weir Calculator

Triangular sharp-crested weir for low-flow measurement. Discharge varies with H to the 5/2 power, giving the V-notch much better resolution than a rectangular weir at small heads.

degrees (full angle)
ft
cfs

Defaults: 90° V-notch, 0.5 ft of head, standard discharge coefficient Cd = 0.58.

$$ Q = \frac{8}{15} \, C_d \, \sqrt{2g} \, \tan\!\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) \, H^{5/2} $$
Q discharge · Cd discharge coefficient (≈ 0.58 for fully-contracted V-notch) · g gravitational acceleration · θ total notch angle · H head measured upstream of the notch.

Why V-notches for low flow

Q ∝ H5/2 for a V-notch versus H3/2 for a rectangular weir. That higher exponent means the head reading is more sensitive to flow at small Q — for a 90° V-notch, going from 0.1 cfs to 0.2 cfs raises H by 32%, while doubling flow over a 1-ft rectangular weir raises H by only 59% as much. So at low flows, you can read the V-notch staff gauge to better precision. That's why every USGS lab flume and small streamflow gauging station uses one.

V-notch discharge table

Pre-computed discharge for fully-contracted V-notches at common heads, using Cd = 0.58 in US units (cfs). Use this to size your stilling well and head-measurement range.

Discharge Q (cfs) for fully-contracted V-notch weirs at standard heads
Head H (ft)22.5°30°45°60°90°120°
0.200.0090.0120.0180.0260.0450.077
0.300.0250.0330.0500.0710.1230.213
0.500.0900.1190.1800.2550.4410.764
0.750.2470.3280.4940.7031.212.10
1.000.5080.6731.0141.4442.494.32
1.250.8901.1791.7762.5274.367.55
1.501.4001.8552.7953.9786.8611.88
2.002.8753.8085.7378.16514.0824.39

Computed from Q = (8/15)·0.58·√64.4·tan(θ/2)·H5/2. For SI (m³/s), multiply by 0.02832 and convert H from ft to m by multiplying by 0.3048.

Standard notch angles — when to use each

V-notch angle selection guide
Angle θBest forQ at H=0.5 ftQ at H=1 ft
22.5°Very low flows (lab, baseflow)0.09 cfs0.51 cfs
30°Small streams, baseflow0.12 cfs0.67 cfs
45°Small ditch monitoring0.18 cfs1.01 cfs
60°Common stream gauging0.26 cfs1.44 cfs
90°Most popular, broad range0.44 cfs2.49 cfs
120°Transitions to rectangular range0.76 cfs4.32 cfs

Worked examples

Example 1 — 90° V-notch, baseflow stream gauging

Given: 90° fully-contracted V-notch, head H = 0.65 ft, Cd = 0.58, US units.
Find: Discharge Q.
tan(45°) = 1.0; √(2·32.174) = 8.025
Q = (8/15) · 0.58 · 8.025 · 1.0 · (0.65)2.5
Q = 2.483 · 0.341
Q = 0.846 cfs

Example 2 — Sizing a 60° V-notch for 0.5–2.0 cfs range

Given: Need to measure 0.5–2.0 cfs in a small monitoring well; check 60° vs 90° notch.
Find: Head range for each option, choose by readability.
60°: H_min = (0.5/(2.5·tan30°))^(2/5) = (0.346)^0.4 = 0.71 ft; H_max = (2.0/(2.5·tan30°))^0.4 = 1.16 ft. Range: 0.45 ft.
90°: H_min = (0.5/2.49)^0.4 = 0.527 ft; H_max = (2.0/2.49)^0.4 = 0.916 ft. Range: 0.39 ft.
60° gives more head range and better readability — pick the 60° notch.

Coefficient Cd

For fully-contracted V-notches (notch sides clear of channel walls and bottom), Cd ≈ 0.58 across angles from 22.5° to 120° at H above 0.2 ft. At smaller heads, surface tension on the nappe matters and Cd can rise to 0.61. ISO 1438 and USBR Water Measurement Manual give angle-specific values for the highest-precision metering.

Range of applicability

Reliable when H is at least 0.2 ft (60 mm) and at most 2 ft (0.6 m) for a 90° notch. Below 0.2 ft, the nappe can cling to the plate (poor ventilation) and surface tension distorts the discharge. Above 2 ft, the V-notch becomes more accurate to model with full physical methods.

Reference: USBR (1997). Water Measurement Manual, Chapter 7. ISO 1438:2017 — Hydrometry — Open channel flow measurement using thin-plate weirs.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real stormwater or hydraulics design problem per month, with the math worked out and the gotchas called out. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLY PE STAMP HERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com