All tools
Open Rational Method calculator →

Rational Method — Q = CiA Reference

The oldest and still the most-used peak-flow method in drainage design. It returns a single number — the peak discharge — and nothing else: no hydrograph, no volume, no routing. Knowing precisely what it does and does not give you is most of using it correctly.

The Equation

UnitsEquationQiA
US customaryQ = C · i · Acfsin/hracres
SIQ = C · i · A / 360m³/smm/hrhectares
SI (alternate)Q = 0.00278 · C · i · Am³/smm/hrhectares
Why the US form needs no conversion factor. One acre-inch per hour is 43,560 ÷ 12 ÷ 3600 = 1.008 cfs. The unit conversion is within 0.8 percent of unity, so it is dropped by convention. That coincidence is the entire reason the equation is written as bare Q = CiA in US units — it is not dimensionless, it is just very nearly 1. The SI form has no such luck, hence the 1/360.

The Three Inputs

TermWhat it isWhere it comes from
CRunoff coefficient, 0 to 1 — the fraction of rainfall that becomes direct runoffLand-cover table; see the runoff coefficient reference
iAverage rainfall intensity over a duration equal to Tc, at the design return periodNOAA Atlas 14 IDF curves for the site
AContributing drainage areaDelineated to the design point
The single most common error is the intensity duration. i is not the intensity of "the 25-year storm" — it is the intensity at a duration equal to the time of concentration. Use a 24-hour depth converted to an hourly rate and you will badly under-predict the peak. Compute Tc first, then read the IDF curve at that duration.
Sizing a whole storm network, not one inlet? HydroComplete carries C, Tc and intensity through every sub-area and reach, and routes the result instead of stopping at a peak.

Composite C for Mixed Land Cover

Ccomposite = Σ(Cj · Aj) / ΣAj

Area-weight the individual coefficients. Do not average them unweighted, and do not apply a single "residential" C to a site that is 40 percent pavement — the weighted value is usually meaningfully higher than the eyeball estimate.

Frequency Adjustment Factor Cf

Published C values are calibrated for storms up to roughly the 10-year event. For rarer events the soil saturates and a larger fraction of rainfall runs off, so C is adjusted upward:

Return periodCfApplied as
2 to 10 year1.0Cadjusted = C · Cf
25 year1.1
50 year1.2
100 year1.25
HEC-22 publishes Cf but FHWA does not endorse it. The adjustment is widely reproduced in state DOT manuals and widely used, but it is an empirical patch rather than a derived correction. Use the value your governing manual specifies; where none is specified, say in the calculations which set you applied.
Cap the product at 1.0. C · Cf greater than unity would mean more runoff leaves than rain fell. A C of 0.90 at the 100-year event gives 1.125 — use 1.0. Many agencies build this cap into their manual; not all do, and spreadsheets frequently miss it.

Assumptions You Are Accepting

AssumptionConsequence when it fails
Rainfall is uniform over the whole areaBreaks down on large watersheds where a storm cell covers only part of the area
Rainfall duration equals or exceeds TcThe peak is not reached; the method over-predicts
Peak flow occurs when the whole area contributesNot true where a small, highly impervious sub-area peaks earlier — check partial-area conditions
C is constant through the stormIgnores the saturation trend that Cf partially patches
Return period of Q equals that of iAn approximation, not a derivation
No storage anywhere in the systemPonds, swales and pipe storage all attenuate the peak; the method cannot see them

When You May Use It

LimitTypical thresholdNote
Drainage area≤ 200 acresMany agencies cap far lower — 20 to 50 acres is common; check the local manual, which governs
Output neededpeak flow onlyIf you need a volume or a hydrograph, use TR-55 / TR-20 / HEC-HMS instead
Storage presentnoneAny detention or routing puts you outside the method
Tc≥ 5 minMost agencies enforce a 5 or 10 minute floor on the IDF read
The partial-area check. A 30-acre site with a 3-acre parking lot at the outlet can peak higher from the parking lot alone than from the whole site, because the small area's short Tc reads a much higher intensity. Run both and take the larger. This is the failure mode that most often shows up as an undersized inlet.

Sources: Kuichling, E. (1889), the original statement of the method. FHWA HEC-22, Urban Drainage Design Manual, 3rd ed. ASCE/WEF MOP 77, Design and Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems. Intensity from NOAA Atlas 14. Cf values as tabulated in HEC-22 and most state DOT drainage manuals — confirm against the manual with jurisdiction over your project, which governs over any general reference including this one.

Need C values? Open the runoff coefficient table → · Run the numbers in the calculator · Compute Tc first.

Related cheat sheets and tools

The Rational Method is one of three inputs working together: time of concentration sets the duration, runoff coefficient C sets the fraction, and the IDF curve supplies i — see design rainfall from Atlas 14. Past 200 acres, or where you need volume rather than a peak, switch to NRCS curve numbers and SCS storm distributions. Once you have Q, size the conveyance with Manning's n. For the full watershed-to-outfall workflow with routing, see HydroComplete, the SaaS sister product to PE-Calc.

Get future cheat sheets in your inbox

One reference card or worked-example case study per month, delivered the moment it's published. Free.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.