Dams in Washington
Washington has 835 dams in the National Inventory of Dams, of which 416 are classified high hazard — of which 35 (8.4%) have no emergency action plan on record. Inventory, condition and hazard data computed from the USACE extract stamped 2026-8-28, with the governing law cited below.
Verified inventory data and a pointer to where Washington's dam safety law lives. It deliberately does not summarise what that law requires — those requirements have not been checked against current primary sources for Washington, and a stale paraphrase of a dam safety statute is worse than none.
For a state written up in full, see North Carolina.
Washington by the numbers
| Measure | Count | National rank |
|---|---|---|
| Total dams | 835 | 35th |
| High hazard | 416 | 14th |
| — with an EAP recorded | 381 | |
| — with no EAP recorded | 35 | 20th largest gap |
| — EAP not required | 0 | |
| High hazard rated Poor | 48 | |
| High hazard rated Unsatisfactory | 5 |
53 of Washington's high-hazard dams are rated Poor or Unsatisfactory (12.7% of them).
Governing law
The dam safety statutes are spread in a number of areas of the Washington Revised Code, with RCW 43.21A.064, 86.16.035, 90.03.350, and 90.03.470 forming the bulk of the pertinent laws. Rules concerning dam safety in the State of Washington are contained in Title 173, Chapter 175 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 173-175-010 et seq.).
Citation compiled from the ASDSO 2020 summary of state dam safety laws and checked to refer to Washington. It tells you where the law lives, not what it currently says: statutes get amended and section numbers get renumbered. Read the current text before relying on it, and contact the Washington dam safety program for a determination that binds.
Counties with the most dams
| County | Dams | High hazard | Poor/Unsat. |
|---|---|---|---|
| King | 93 | 63 | 1 |
| Yakima | 50 | 36 | 7 |
| Grant | 44 | 13 | 2 |
| Snohomish | 42 | 21 | 6 |
| Chelan | 37 | 32 | 7 |
| San Juan | 37 | 9 | 1 |
| Lewis | 36 | 10 | 3 |
| Stevens | 35 | 15 | 5 |
| Pierce | 35 | 24 | 2 |
| Okanogan | 33 | 20 | 3 |
| Whatcom | 32 | 24 | 0 |
| Spokane | 30 | 10 | 5 |
Where to go for Washington's requirements
This page does not summarise what Washington law requires. These do, or will point you at someone who can:
- ASDSO — Washington dam safety programme. The Association of State Dam Safety Officials maintains a page per state with the programme contact. Start here if you need to reach a regulator.
- National Inventory of Dams. Search by state or county for an individual dam's record — the source of every figure on this page.
- FEMA National Dam Safety Program. Federal guidance that underpins most state schemes, including P-93 on hazard classification and P-94 on selecting design floods.
- How four neighbouring states differ. North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Virginia compared on permit thresholds, classification and emergency action plans — useful for calibrating what to expect from any state programme.
How Washington compares
Nationally, 2,476 of 17,049 high-hazard dams have no emergency action plan on record. Washington accounts for 1.4% of that gap. Full rankings, method and the downloadable dataset are on the national EAP gap page.
Data source. Computed from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Inventory of Dams national extract, stamped 2026-8-28. NID reflects what state and federal programs have reported to USACE; an "EAP Prepared: No" flag means no plan is recorded rather than proof that none exists.