All tools

Manning's Equation — Trapezoidal Grass Channel Worked Example

Sizing check on a grass-lined trapezoidal outfall channel carrying a detention pond's 10-year release plus bypass flow. We iterate Manning's equation to normal depth for the design discharge, then run the checks a reviewer expects: velocity against the lining, Froude number, tractive shear per FHWA HEC-15, and freeboard. Sources: Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics (1959); FHWA HEC-15, Design of Roadside Channels with Flexible Linings.

The channel

A 600-ft grass-lined swale conveys the combined 10-yr design flow of 60 cfs from a pond outfall to the receiving stream. Geometry from the grading plan:

Bottom width b4.0 ft
Side slopes z3H:1V (maintainable, mowable)
Longitudinal slope S0.8% = 0.008 ft/ft
Manning's n0.035 (established grass, moderate flow depth; see n reference)
Design discharge Q60 cfs
Step 1 · Geometry functions

A, P, R for a trapezoid

A = y(b + zy) = y(4 + 3y)
P = b + 2y√(1 + z²) = 4 + 2y√10 = 4 + 6.325y
R = A/P

Manning's (US units): Q = (1.486/n) · A · R2/3 · S1/2
  1.486/0.035 = 42.46,  √S = √0.008 = 0.0894

Geometry formulas for all standard shapes are on the open channel geometry card.

Step 2 · Iterate to normal depth

Bracket and refine y until Q = 60 cfs

Trial y (ft)A (ft²)P (ft)R (ft)Q (cfs)Bracket
1.5012.7513.490.94546.6Low
1.8016.9215.381.10068.5High
1.7015.4714.751.04960.6High (close)
1.6915.3314.691.04459.9Match
Normal depth yn ≈ 1.70 ft
Check at 1.70: A = 1.70(4 + 5.10) = 15.47 ft², P = 4 + 6.325(1.70) = 14.75 ft, R = 1.049 ft
Q = 42.46 · 15.47 · 1.0492/3 · 0.0894 = 42.46 · 15.47 · 1.032 · 0.0894 = 60.6 cfs ≈ 60 ✓
n is depth-dependent in grass. Retardance drops as grass submerges and lays over — n = 0.035 assumes the design depth well exceeds the mowed grass height. At shallow depths in the same channel (early storm, low flow), effective n can be 0.05–0.10 and depths run deeper than a constant-n model predicts. HEC-15's retardance-class curves handle this; a single n is a design-depth simplification.
Step 3 · Velocity and Froude checks

Is the flow erosive or unstable?

V = Q/A = 60/15.47 = 3.88 ft/s
Top width T = b + 2zy = 4 + 6(1.70) = 14.2 ft
Hydraulic depth Dh = A/T = 15.47/14.2 = 1.089 ft
Fr = V/√(gDh) = 3.88/√(32.2 · 1.089) = 3.88/5.92 = 0.66 — subcritical

3.9 ft/s is within the customary 4–6 ft/s permissible range for established grass on erosion-resistant soils; on easily eroded soils, the classical permissible-velocity guidance drops toward 3–4 ft/s. Modern practice checks shear instead — next step.

Step 4 · Tractive shear (HEC-15)

The modern lining check

τ = γ · y · S = 62.4 · 1.70 · 0.008 = 0.85 lb/ft²

Compare against the permissible shear for the specified lining and soil from HEC-15 — healthy established grass linings commonly carry permissible shear on the order of 1 lb/ft² and up depending on retardance class and underlying soil, so 0.85 is workable but not generous. During establishment (bare or matted soil), permissible shear is far lower — specify a turf reinforcement mat or erosion control blanket rated for ≥ 0.85 lb/ft² until the stand matures.

Design the establishment period, not just the end state. The most common grass-channel failure is the first season: design storm arrives before the grass does. The lining spec (ECB/TRM class) must carry the design shear unvegetated, per HEC-15 Chapter 5.
Step 5 · Freeboard and total section

Finished geometry

Normal depth 1.70 ft + freeboard 0.5 ft (typical minimum for small channels) = 2.2 ft total depth
Top width at freeboard elevation: 4 + 6(2.2) = 17.2 ft

Agency criteria vary (0.5 ft minimum, 1 ft common, more where a berm impounds). Superelevation and standing-wave allowances apply on bends. The grading footprint — 17+ ft of top width for a 4-ft-bottom channel — is why 3H:1V grass channels eat right-of-way, and why steeper-sided lined channels get chosen where space is tight.

Tools used in this example

Reproduce every step: Manning's equation tool (trapezoidal mode) for the normal-depth iteration, the Manning's n card for the grass value, the channel geometry card for A/P/R, and the riprap sizing tool if the shear check fails and the lining hardens.

Get future worked examples in your inbox

One real stormwater or hydraulics design problem per month, with the math worked out and the gotchas called out. Free.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.