All tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

Broad-Crested Weir Calculator

Discharge over a flat-topped weir or spillway crest where the crest is wide enough that the flow becomes critical at the crest. The standard equation for dam spillways, drop structures, and concrete overflow weirs.

ft
ft
— (US: ft½/s)
cfs

Defaults: 20 ft long uncontrolled spillway, 2 ft of head, typical concrete crest.

$$ Q = C \, L \, H^{3/2} $$
Q discharge · C discharge coefficient (typically 2.6 to 3.4 in US ft½/s units; 1.4 to 1.9 in SI m½/s) · L effective crest length · H total head over crest including velocity head.

Discharge coefficient table

Pick the C-value matching your spillway crest geometry. Approach velocity, head/crest-thickness ratio, and approach depth all influence C; the values below are typical design ranges.

Discharge coefficients C for broad-crested weirs and spillways (Q = C·L·H3/2)
Crest type / configurationC (US, ft1/2/s)C (SI, m1/2/s)
Round-nosed broad crest, smooth3.051.69
Round-nosed broad crest, with sloped upstream face3.101.71
Square-nosed broad crest2.651.46
Square-nosed with rounded upstream corner2.851.57
Earth dam emergency spillway, vegetated2.851.57
Earth spillway, mowed grass3.001.66
Concrete ogee spillway, at design head3.952.18
Concrete ogee spillway, low head (H/Hd < 0.5)3.551.96
Concrete ogee spillway, high head (H/Hd > 1.5)4.102.26
Compound (stepped) crest, smooth steps2.551.41
Trapezoidal cross-section, riprap-lined2.651.46

Source: USBR (1987), Design of Small Dams, 3rd ed., Chapter 9. ASCE (1995) Hydraulic Design of Spillways, ASCE Manual 79. Brater, King, Lindell & Wei (1996), Handbook of Hydraulics, Table 5-1.

Worked examples

Example 1 — 30-ft concrete spillway, design flood Q₁₀₀

Given: 30-ft long round-nosed broad-crested concrete spillway (C = 3.05), Q₁₀₀ = 450 cfs, no piers.
Find: Required head H over the crest.
Solve Q = C·L·H3/2 for H: H = (Q / (C·L))2/3
H = (450 / (3.05 · 30))2/3 = (4.918)2/3
H = 2.89 ft above crest

Example 2 — Earth dam emergency spillway, 100-ft wide, vegetated

Given: Vegetated earth emergency spillway, L = 100 ft, C = 2.85, design flood produces H = 1.5 ft over crest.
Find: Discharge Q.
Q = 2.85 · 100 · (1.5)1.5 = 285 · 1.837
Q = 523 cfs

Broad vs. sharp-crested distinction

A weir is "broad" when the crest length in the flow direction (the thickness of the weir) is enough for the flow to become critical (depth = critical depth) on top. The transition is roughly at H/B between 0.08 and 0.50, where B is crest thickness — below 0.08, the weir is sharp-crested; above 0.50, the weir behaves more like a step or short-crested structure.

Submergence

If the downstream water level rises above 60–70% of the upstream head over the crest, the weir becomes submerged and the discharge equation under-reads. Apply a submergence reduction factor — see USBR Water Measurement Manual figure 7-13 or Brater & King chapter 5. For dam-safety inflow design floods, the spillway is typically assumed not submerged at peak.

Effective crest length

The crest length L should be reduced for piers and abutments (contractions). For a spillway with two abutments and N piers, effective length = Lnet − 2(NKp + Ka)H, where Kp and Ka are pier and abutment contraction coefficients (~0.01–0.05 each). For preliminary calculations, ignore contraction; for spillway sizing, account for it.

Reference: USBR (1987). Design of Small Dams (3rd ed.), Chapter 9. Also Chow (1959) Open-Channel Hydraulics and ASCE Manual 51, Design of Hydraulic Structures.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real stormwater or hydraulics design problem per month, with the math worked out and the gotchas called out. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLY PE STAMP HERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com