All dam-safety tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

Embankment Seepage Calculator

Casagrande/Schaffernak Kozeny-parabola phreatic line + Darcy seepage flow rate for a homogeneous earthfill dam on impervious foundation with a horizontal toe drain. Returns focal distance y₀, seepage Q per unit length of dam, and the parabolic phreatic surface coordinates.

ft
ft
ft/day
ft
ft
ft³/day/ft
ft³/day
gpm
ft
ft
ft

Geometry: x = 0 is the upstream end of the horizontal toe drain. h is the head differential. d is the horizontal distance from where the upstream water surface intersects the upstream slope to the upstream end of the toe drain. Origin coordinates are at base elevation. Provide k in length/time consistent with your output units.

$$ y_0 = \sqrt{d^2 + h^2} - d, \qquad q = k\, y_0 $$
$$ y(x) = \sqrt{y_0^2 + 2\,y_0\,x} \quad\text{(Kozeny parabola)} $$
h head difference (reservoir minus toe-drain elev.) · d horizontal distance from upstream phreatic-line entry to drain start · y0 focal distance · k permeability · q seepage per unit length of dam.

Permeability of compacted earth-dam materials

Typical k for compacted earthfill (USACE EM 1110-2-1901)
Materialk (cm/s)k (ft/day)
Clean gravel, GW/GP10⁻¹ – 10¹300 – 30,000
Sand and gravel, SW10⁻³ – 10⁻¹3 – 300
Silty sand, SM10⁻⁵ – 10⁻³0.03 – 3
Compacted silt, ML10⁻⁶ – 10⁻⁴0.003 – 0.3
Compacted clay (core), CL/CH10⁻⁹ – 10⁻⁷3×10⁻⁶ – 3×10⁻⁴
Drain / filter material10⁻¹ – 10⁰300 – 3,000

Source: USACE EM 1110-2-1901 (1993), Seepage Analysis and Control for Dams, Table 2-1; Cedergren, H.R. (1989), Seepage, Drainage, and Flow Nets.

Worked example

Example — small homogeneous earthfill dam

Given: h = 60 ft, d = 120 ft (toe-drain projection), k = 0.5 ft/day (silty sand), Ldam = 500 ft.
y0 = √(120² + 60²) − 120 = √(18,000) − 120 = 134.16 − 120 = 14.16 ft
q = k·y0 = 0.5 · 14.16 = 7.08 ft³/day per ft of dam
Q = q·Ldam = 7.08 · 500 = 3,540 ft³/day = 18.4 gpm total seepage
y(60 ft from drain) = √(14.16² + 2·14.16·60) = √(1900) = 43.6 ft above base
Drain capacity must exceed 18 gpm with a safety factor; check toe-drain gradation and capacity.

Limitations and when to upgrade to FE

This calculator handles the simplest dam-safety case: homogeneous, isotropic earthfill on an impervious foundation with a horizontal toe drain. For zoned embankments (clay core + transition + shell), pervious foundations, anisotropic permeability, or multi-layer profiles — use a 2-D finite-element seepage solver (SEEP/W, MIKE-SHE, MODFLOW). The Casagrande result is still useful as a sanity check on the FE solution: total Q should be within a factor of 2 of k·y₀ for typical geometries.

References: Casagrande, A. (1937). Seepage through Dams, Journal of New England Water Works Assoc. 51(2). USACE EM 1110-2-1901 (1993), Seepage Analysis and Control for Dams. Cedergren, H.R. (1989). Seepage, Drainage, and Flow Nets, 3rd ed., Wiley.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real design problem per month. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLYPE STAMPHERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com