All tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

Geogrid Retaining Wall Calculator (Reinforced Block Wall)

Preliminary design of a geogrid-reinforced segmental (modular block) retaining wall. External stability treats the reinforced zone as a gravity mass: sliding, overturning, eccentricity and bearing. Internal stability checks each geogrid layer for rupture and pullout, then reports the long-term design strength (LTDS) and the geogrid length that the critical layers need.

ft
in
in
in
pcf
pcf
degrees
pcf
degrees
degrees
psf
psf
ft
in
in
lb/ft
—
lb/ft
——
—lb/ft
——
——
—ft
—psf
——
—lb/ft
——
——
—lb/ft
—ft
——
LayerElev. (ft)Tmax (lb/ft)FoS ruptureLe (ft)FoS pulloutFoS connection

Layers are placed at the first height and then every Sv until one course below the top. Pullout uses the fill weight only (σv = γr(H − z)); the live surcharge is excluded from resistance but included in the load. External thrust is Rankine and horizontal for level backfill; the reinforced mass's weight includes the facing. The default Ci = 0.70 is a placeholder, not a product value — FHWA-NHI-10-024 Table 3-6 directs that the pullout factor for geogrids come from tests.

$$ T_{max,j} = K_{a,r}\left(\gamma_r\,(H - \bar z_j) + q\right) S_{v,j},\qquad FoS_{rupture} = \frac{\text{LTDS}}{T_{max}},\qquad FoS_{pullout} = \frac{2\,L_e\,C_i\,\gamma_r (H - z_j)\tan\varphi_r}{T_{max}} $$
$$ \tan(\alpha - \varphi_r) = \frac{-\tan\varphi_r + \sqrt{\tan\varphi_r\left(\tan\varphi_r + \cot(\varphi_r+\omega)\right)\left(1+\tan(-\omega)\cot(\varphi_r+\omega)\right)}}{1+\tan(-\omega)\left(\tan\varphi_r+\cot(\varphi_r+\omega)\right)} $$
Sv,j tributary height (halfway to adjacent layers; base and top at the ends) · z̄j centre of the tributary height · α failure plane angle from horizontal (45° + φr/2 for a vertical wall), starting at the back of the facing unit at the base · Le geogrid length behind that plane · ω wall batter. External: F = ½KaγH² + KaqH; sliding resisted by W·tan(min φr, φf).

Acceptance criteria used

Minimum factors of safety (NCMA-based, as adopted in municipal SRW standards) and FHWA geometry rules
CheckLimitSource
Base sliding1.5NCMA-based (Clayton NC Table 2.1)
Overturning2.0NCMA-based (Clayton NC Table 2.1)
Bearing capacity2.0 on qultEnter qallow = qult/2.0
Eccentricitye ≤ L/6Soil foundation, full base contact
Pullout1.5NCMA-based (Clayton NC Table 2.1)
Rupture (on LTDS)1.5NCMA uncertainty factor; some standards use less on LTDS — check yours
Facing connection1.5NCMA-based (Clayton NC Table 2.1)
Global stability1.3Not computed — slope-stability analysis
Minimum length0.6H / 0.7HClayton NC (0.7H or 8 ft for highway loading) / FHWA-NHI-10-024 §4.2

Worked example

Example — 8-ft wall, 100 psf surcharge (the calculator defaults)

Given: H = 8 ft of 12 × 8-in units with a 0.75-in setback; reinforced fill γr = 120 pcf, φr = 34°; retained and foundation soil φ = 30°; q = 100 psf; L = 5.5 ft; layers at 8 in and every 16 in; LTDS = 1,500 lb/ft; Ci = 0.70.
External: Rankine Ka = 0.333 → F = ½(0.333)(120)(8²) + 0.333(100)(8) = 1,280 + 267 = 1,547 lb/ft · W = 120(1.0)(8) + 120(4.5)(8) = 5,280 lb/ft · FoSSL = 5,280 tan 30° / 1,547 = 1.97 ✓ · FoSOT = 14,520 / 4,480 = 3.24 ✓ · e = 0.85 ft < L/6 = 0.92 ft ✓ · σv = 1,427 psf ✓
Internal: batter ω = 5.4° → Coulomb Ka,r (δ = 0) = 0.248; failure plane at 59.3° from horizontal (62° = 45 + 34/2 if the wall were vertical). Six layers at 0.67, 2.00, 3.33, 4.67, 6.00 and 7.33 ft.
Bottom layer: T = 0.248 × (120 × 7.33 + 100) × 1.33 = 325 lb/ft → rupture FoS = 1,500/325 = 4.62 ✓ (a grid with LTDS ≥ 487 lb/ft would do). Top layer: Le = 0.84 ft behind the plane under only σv = 80 psf → Pr = 2(0.84)(0.70)(80)tan 34° = 63 lb/ft vs T = 60 lb/ft → pullout FoS = 1.06 ✗
Pullout at the top layer governs, as it usually does: the calculator asks for L ≥ 5.85 ft. With L = 6.0 ft every check passes (top-layer pullout FoS = 1.69, sliding 2.15, e = 0.78 ft < 1.00 ft).

What this calculator does not cover

References: FHWA-NHI-10-024, Berg, R.R., Christopher, B.R. & Samtani, N.C. (2009), Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes, Vol. I — simplified method, Kr/Ka for extensible reinforcement, Eq. 3-2 and Table 3-6 (pullout), minimum length 0.7H. National Concrete Masonry Association, Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls, 3rd ed. Town of Clayton, NC, Segmental Block Retaining Wall Design (2010), Table 2.1. Meyerhof, G.G. (1953), effective-width bearing.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real design problem per month. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLYPE STAMPHERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com