All dam-safety tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

Dam Hazard Classification

Screening-level hazard classification per FEMA P-94 (Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams). Walks through the consequence-based decision tree from breach inundation impacts and assigns Low / Significant / High classification with the corresponding inflow design flood guidance.

Downstream consequences of a hypothetical breach

Screening tool only. State dam-safety programs are the regulatory authority. For borderline cases (e.g., a single dwelling at the edge of the inundation footprint), submit a breach analysis to the state dam-safety engineer for a formal classification decision.

FEMA P-94 hazard classification matrix

Hazard classification — direct consequences from breach
HazardLoss of lifeEconomic / environmental / lifeline
High (HH)Probable. ≥ 1 expected fatalityYes — typically extensive
Significant (SH)No probable loss of lifeYes — appreciable damage to public/private infrastructure or environmental damage
Low (LH)No probable loss of lifeNo — minimal damage, mostly to dam owner's property

Inflow design flood guidance by hazard class

The IDF is the design flood the spillway and freeboard must safely pass. FEMA P-94 (Table 4-1) and FERC Engineering Guidelines link IDF to hazard:

Recommended IDF — FEMA P-94 / FERC / state dam-safety programs
Hazard classDam sizeRecommended IDF
HighLarge (H ≥ 100 ft or storage ≥ 50,000 ac-ft)PMF
HighIntermediate½ PMF — PMF
HighSmall (H < 40 ft or < 1,000 ac-ft)100-yr — ½ PMF
SignificantAll sizes100-yr — ½ PMF
LowLarge or intermediate50-yr — 100-yr
LowSmall25-yr — 100-yr

Source: FEMA P-94 (2013), Table 4-1. FERC Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects Chapter 8. USACE EC 1110-8-2(FR). State dam-safety programs may apply more stringent rules.

Worked example

Example — small farm-pond dam below new subdivision

Setup: 35-ft earthfill embankment, 200 ac-ft storage. Breach analysis shows inundation footprint includes 8 single-family homes in a subdivision 0.5 miles downstream and crosses a state highway.
Inhabited residences: 8 → "1–10" → loss of life probable in inhabited zone
Highway impact: state road = "major arterial" → significant economic damage
Classification: HIGH HAZARD. IDF: 100-yr to ½ PMF (small dam, but loss of life triggers HH).

State-level overlays

FEMA P-94 is a federal recommendation, not a regulation. Each state implements its own program with the same three-tier structure but slightly different size/storage thresholds and IDF requirements. Examples:

Verify with the state dam-safety engineer before adopting a classification.

References: FEMA (2013), P-94: Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams. ASDSO & FEMA (2010), Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classification System for Dams (FEMA 333). USACE EC 1110-8-2(FR) (1991). FERC Engineering Guidelines, Chapter 2.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real design problem per month. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLYPE STAMPHERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com