Dam Hazard Classification
Screening-level hazard classification per FEMA P-94 (Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams). Walks through the consequence-based decision tree from breach inundation impacts and assigns Low / Significant / High classification with the corresponding inflow design flood guidance.
Downstream consequences of a hypothetical breach
Screening tool only. State dam-safety programs are the regulatory authority. For borderline cases (e.g., a single dwelling at the edge of the inundation footprint), submit a breach analysis to the state dam-safety engineer for a formal classification decision.
FEMA P-94 hazard classification matrix
| Hazard | Loss of life | Economic / environmental / lifeline |
|---|---|---|
| High (HH) | Probable. ≥ 1 expected fatality | Yes — typically extensive |
| Significant (SH) | No probable loss of life | Yes — appreciable damage to public/private infrastructure or environmental damage |
| Low (LH) | No probable loss of life | No — minimal damage, mostly to dam owner's property |
Inflow design flood guidance by hazard class
The IDF is the design flood the spillway and freeboard must safely pass. FEMA P-94 (Table 4-1) and FERC Engineering Guidelines link IDF to hazard:
| Hazard class | Dam size | Recommended IDF |
|---|---|---|
| High | Large (H ≥ 100 ft or storage ≥ 50,000 ac-ft) | PMF |
| High | Intermediate | ½ PMF — PMF |
| High | Small (H < 40 ft or < 1,000 ac-ft) | 100-yr — ½ PMF |
| Significant | All sizes | 100-yr — ½ PMF |
| Low | Large or intermediate | 50-yr — 100-yr |
| Low | Small | 25-yr — 100-yr |
Source: FEMA P-94 (2013), Table 4-1. FERC Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects Chapter 8. USACE EC 1110-8-2(FR). State dam-safety programs may apply more stringent rules.
Worked example
Example — small farm-pond dam below new subdivision
State-level overlays
FEMA P-94 is a federal recommendation, not a regulation. Each state implements its own program with the same three-tier structure but slightly different size/storage thresholds and IDF requirements. Examples:
- North Carolina (15A NCAC 02K): high hazard requires PMF for dams with H ≥ 25 ft AND impoundment ≥ 50 ac-ft. Smaller HH dams may use the NC EZ EAP template.
- California (Division of Safety of Dams): all dams ≥ 25 ft tall OR ≥ 50 ac-ft are jurisdictional. HH IDF is full PMF; SH is the 1000-yr or ½ PMF; LH is 100-yr.
- Texas (TCEQ): hazard class drives IDF per 30 TAC 299. HH = ¾ to full PMF; SH = ½ to ¾ PMF; LH = 25- to 100-yr.
Verify with the state dam-safety engineer before adopting a classification.
References: FEMA (2013), P-94: Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams. ASDSO & FEMA (2010), Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classification System for Dams (FEMA 333). USACE EC 1110-8-2(FR) (1991). FERC Engineering Guidelines, Chapter 2.
Related tools
- Dam breach — get the breach hydrograph for inundation mapping
- Inflow design flood — pick the IDF % PMF
- Reservoir routing — confirm spillway can pass the IDF
- Wave runup & freeboard — verify freeboard at IDF max pool