All tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

Pile Capacity (α and β Methods)

Ultimate axial capacity of a single straight-shaft pile in clay (α method) or sand (β method). Sums skin friction and end-bearing contributions, with allowable capacity by factor of safety. For homogeneous-soil idealization; layered soils require summing per-layer skin friction.

ft
ft
pcf
psf
— (Tomlinson chart, ~0.4–1.0)
degrees
— (driven: 1.0; drilled: 0.7)
— (typically 3.0)
kips
kips
kips
kips

Defaults: 1-ft diameter pile, 40 ft long, in stiff clay (cu = 1500 psf, α = 0.55) — typical building foundation pile. Switch soil type to "sand" for the β method.

Total capacity:
$$ Q_{ult} = Q_s + Q_p $$
Skin friction (α method, clay):
$$ Q_s = \alpha \, c_u \cdot (\pi B \, L) $$
Skin friction (β method, sand):
$$ Q_s = K \tan\delta \, \bar\sigma'_v \cdot (\pi B \, L), \qquad \delta \approx 0.7 \phi $$
End bearing:
$$ Q_p = q_p \cdot \tfrac{\pi}{4} B^2 $$
Clay (φ = 0): qp = 9 cu. Sand: qp = σ'v(L) × Nq, with Nq from Berezantsev / Vesić.
α empirical adhesion factor, function of cu · K earth pressure coefficient on pile face · δ pile-soil friction angle (≈ 0.7 φ for steel/concrete in sand) · σ'v effective vertical stress · Nq end-bearing factor (function of φ).

α method (clay) — Tomlinson chart

The α factor is read from a Tomlinson-type chart vs cu. Approximate fit: α = 1.0 for cu < 500 psf, declining to α = 0.4 for cu > 5000 psf. The reduction reflects how stiff clay has lower adhesion to the pile face per unit shear strength than soft clay does — partly because of remolding around the pile during driving.

Total stress (α) is appropriate for short-term load, before the pile-soil interface drains. For long-term sustained loads, the β method (effective stress) gives more reliable predictions.

β method (sand and effective stress)

β = K tan δ where K is the lateral earth pressure ratio on the pile shaft and δ is the pile-soil interface friction angle. Typical β ranges:

Critical depth concept: skin friction in sand reaches a maximum value at Lc/B ≈ 10–20 below ground, then plateaus. Above that depth, σ'v increases linearly. Below, it's roughly constant. This calculator uses average σ'v across the embedment length, which over-predicts for very long piles.

End bearing in sand — Nq matters

For sand, qp = σ'v(tip) × Nq. Nq is highly sensitive to φ — at φ = 30°, Nq ≈ 30; at φ = 40°, Nq ≈ 200. This calculator uses the Berezantsev/Meyerhof correlation:

Nq = exp(π tan φ) × tan²(45 + φ/2) (same as Vesić bearing-capacity factor, conservative)

For piles bearing on dense sand or gravel, end bearing dominates; for piles in clay, skin friction dominates (typically > 80%).

FS values

What this doesn't do

Reference: Tomlinson, M.J. (1957). "The Adhesion of Piles Driven in Clay Soils." Proc. 4th ICSMFE, London. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, §10.7. FHWA NHI-05-042 (2006). Design and Construction of Driven Pile Foundations.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real stormwater or hydraulics design problem per month, with the math worked out and the gotchas called out. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLY PE STAMP HERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com