All tools Print with PE stamp box Designed for sealed engineering submittals — print drops PE stamp + signature block at the end.

CSTR & PFR Reactor Sizing

Required reactor volume for a single irreversible reaction (first- or second-order in a single reactant). Continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and plug flow reactor (PFR) compared at the same conversion target. Reports the volume ratio — relevant for staged reactor design.

mol/L (or mol/m³)
— (0.0 to 1.0; 0.9 = 90% conversion)
1/min (1st order) or L/(mol·min) (2nd)
L/min (or any consistent unit)
L
L
— (1st order, 90% X: ratio = 3.9)
min
min

Defaults: 1st-order reaction, 90% conversion, k = 0.1/min — homework chestnut. CSTR needs ~3.9× the volume of PFR for same conversion. The volume ratio grows steeply at high X.

1st order, CSTR design eq:
$$ V_{CSTR} = \frac{v_0 \, X}{k (1 - X)} $$
1st order, PFR (integrated):
$$ V_{PFR} = \frac{v_0}{k} \ln\!\frac{1}{1 - X} $$
2nd order, CSTR:
$$ V_{CSTR} = \frac{v_0 \, X}{k \, C_{A0} (1 - X)^2} $$
2nd order, PFR:
$$ V_{PFR} = \frac{v_0}{k \, C_{A0}} \cdot \frac{X}{1 - X} $$
V reactor volume · v0 volumetric flow rate (constant density assumed) · X fractional conversion · k rate constant · CA0 inlet concentration · τ = V / v0 space time.

CSTR vs PFR — when to use which

For positive-order kinetics (rate increases with concentration), PFR is more efficient — it operates at high concentration most of the way, only experiencing the slow tail at the outlet. CSTR operates everywhere at the outlet concentration (slow). Hence the volume penalty.

The volume ratio grows with conversion target:

For very high conversion, PFR is dramatically more efficient. CSTRs in series approach PFR behavior — 3 CSTRs in series gives ~70% of PFR efficiency at X = 0.9.

Why pick CSTR anyway

Despite the volume penalty, CSTRs are popular for several reasons:

Beyond simple kinetics

This calculator handles single irreversible 1st- or 2nd-order reactions with constant volumetric flow. Real chemistry has:

For these, use Aspen Plus, gPROMS, COMSOL, or solve the design ODEs numerically (Fogler ch. 8–14).

Liquid-phase, constant-density assumption

For most liquid-phase reactions in dilute solution, the volumetric flow doesn't change with conversion (ε = 0). For gas-phase, especially at high conversion of a reactant that produces multiple moles of product, ε can be 0.5 or higher and changes the design equation. PFR with ε ≠ 0:

V = v₀/k × ∫(1 + εX)/(1 − X) dX (1st order, gas)

This calculator uses ε = 0; for gas-phase, multiply CSTR volume by (1 + εX) and PFR volume by an integration correction factor.

Reference: Fogler, H.S. (2016). Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 5th ed., Pearson, ch. 1–4. Smith, J.M. (1981). Chemical Engineering Kinetics, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill.

Related tools

Monthly engineering case studies

One real stormwater or hydraulics design problem per month, with the math worked out and the gotchas called out. No tutorials, no fluff.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

Engineer of Record — Stamp & Signature
APPLY PE STAMP HERE
Engineer Name
License No.
State
Signature
Date
Project / Sheet
By stamping and signing, the Engineer of Record certifies that the inputs, formulas, and applicability of this calculation have been reviewed for the specific design context. PE-Calc tools provide computational support only — the engineer is responsible for verifying results, applying engineering judgment, and complying with applicable codes and standards.
Calculation generated at pe-calc.com