Permissible Velocity & Shear Stress — Reference
What a channel lining can take before it moves — stated both ways engineers are asked for it. The velocity tables are the older, simpler screen; the tractive-force tables are what actually governs. Both are here because criteria manuals still cite both.
The Tractive Force
Side slope: τs = K1 · τd Bend: τb = Kb · τd
Design check: τpermissible ≥ SF · τd
Use the maximum depth, not the hydraulic radius, for the bed shear in a lining check. HEC-15 recommends a safety factor of 1.0 to 1.5, toward the upper end where failure of the lining would endanger a road embankment, a dam, or a downstream structure.
Side-slope and bend factors (HEC-15)
| Factor | Relation |
|---|---|
| K1, side slope (z:1 horizontal:vertical) | 0.77 for z ≤ 1.5 · 0.066z + 0.67 for 1.5 < z < 5 · 1.0 for z ≥ 5 |
| Kb, bend (Rc = centerline radius, T = top width) | 2.00 for Rc/T ≤ 2 · 2.38 − 0.206(Rc/T) + 0.0073(Rc/T)² for 2 < Rc/T < 10 · 1.05 for Rc/T ≥ 10 |
Bend protection extends a length Lp downstream of the bend exit, not just through the curve — the secondary circulation takes distance to decay. A common failure is a correctly sized bend lining that stops at the point of tangency.
Permissible Velocity & Tractive Force — Unlined Channels
Fortier & Scobey values for straight channels of small slope, after aging. “Clear water” vs. “water carrying colloidal silts” — sediment-laden flow permits more because the deposited fines armor the boundary.
| Material | n | V, clear (ft/s) | V, colloidal silts (ft/s) | τp, clear (lb/ft²) | τp, colloidal (lb/ft²) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fine sand, colloidal | 0.020 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 0.075 | 0.15 |
| Sandy loam, noncolloidal | 0.020 | 1.75 | 2.50 | 0.075 | 0.15 |
| Silt loam, noncolloidal | 0.020 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 0.11 | 0.22 |
| Alluvial silts, noncolloidal | 0.020 | 2.00 | 3.50 | 0.11 | 0.22 |
| Ordinary firm loam | 0.020 | 2.50 | 3.50 | 0.15 | 0.22 |
| Volcanic ash | 0.020 | 2.50 | 3.50 | 0.15 | 0.22 |
| Stiff clay, very colloidal | 0.025 | 3.75 | 5.00 | 0.26 | 0.46 |
| Alluvial silts, colloidal | 0.025 | 3.75 | 5.00 | 0.26 | 0.46 |
| Shales and hardpans | 0.025 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| Fine gravel | 0.020 | 2.50 | 5.00 | 0.075 | 0.32 |
| Graded loam to cobbles, noncolloidal | 0.030 | 3.75 | 5.00 | 0.38 | 0.66 |
| Graded silts to cobbles, colloidal | 0.030 | 4.00 | 5.50 | 0.43 | 0.80 |
| Coarse gravel, noncolloidal | 0.025 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 0.30 | 0.67 |
| Cobbles and shingles | 0.035 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 0.91 | 1.10 |
Grass-Lined Channels — Permissible Velocity (NRCS)
| Cover | Slope (%) | Erosion-resistant soil (ft/s) | Easily eroded soil (ft/s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bermudagrass | 0–5 | 8 | 6 |
| 5–10 | 7 | 5 | |
| > 10 | 6 | 4 | |
| Buffalograss, Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, blue grama | 0–5 | 7 | 5 |
| 5–10 | 6 | 4 | |
| > 10 | 5 | 3 | |
| Grass-legume mixture | 0–5 | 5 | 4 |
| 5–10 | 4 | 3 | |
| Lespedeza sericea, weeping lovegrass, kudzu, alfalfa, crabgrass | 0–5 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| Annuals used as temporary cover | 0–5 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Grass-legume mixtures and the bunch/annual covers are not recommended on slopes steeper than 10% and 5% respectively. All values assume a uniform, well-established stand — the design condition for the first storm after seeding is bare soil plus whatever temporary lining you specified.
Permissible Shear Stress by Lining (HEC-15)
| Lining | τp (lb/ft²) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Temporary / rolled erosion control products | ||
| Woven paper net | 0.15 | Very short service life |
| Jute net | 0.45 | |
| Fiberglass roving, single | 0.60 | |
| Fiberglass roving, double | 0.85 | |
| Straw with net | 1.45 | The common construction-phase lining |
| Curled wood mat | 1.55 | |
| Synthetic mat | 2.00 | |
| Vegetative, by retardance class | ||
| Class A — very high retardance | 3.70 | Excellent stand, tall (~30 in.): weeping lovegrass, yellow bluestem |
| Class B — high | 2.10 | Good stand mowed 12–24 in.: smooth brome, Bermudagrass |
| Class C — moderate | 1.00 | Good stand mowed ~6 in.; grass-legume mixture |
| Class D — low | 0.60 | Good stand mowed ~2.5 in.; buffalograss |
| Class E — very low | 0.35 | Cut to 1.5 in.; burned or sparse stubble |
| Gravel & riprap | ||
| Gravel, D50 = 1 in. | 0.33 | All four follow τp ≈ 4 · D50(ft) |
| Gravel, D50 = 2 in. | 0.67 | |
| Rock riprap, D50 = 6 in. | 2.00 | |
| Rock riprap, D50 = 12 in. | 4.00 | |
Retardance class is not a species — it is a species plus a stand condition plus a mowing height, and it changes seasonally. Design the lining for the retardance class that will exist at the worst time of year, and check capacity (Manning's n) for the class that will exist at the best time of year; those are two different classes and two different checks.
Rigid Linings
Cast-in-place concrete, grouted riprap, soil cement and articulated block are not shear-limited within the range of ordinary channel design. They fail three other ways, and those are what the design has to address:
| Failure mode | What to detail |
|---|---|
| Undermining at the downstream terminus | Cutoff wall / toe-down keyed below the expected scour depth |
| Uplift from groundwater or from flow beneath the slab | Weep holes, underdrain, filter or geotextile bedding |
| Loss of subgrade support through joints and cracks | Joint sealing, reinforcement, and a graded filter under the lining |
Sources: FHWA HEC-15, Design of Roadside Channels with Flexible Linings (permissible shear by lining, K1 and Kb factors); Fortier & Scobey (1926) as tabulated in Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics, Table 7-3; NRCS/SCS grass-lined channel permissible velocities. Manufacturer-tested values for a specific RECP or TRM supersede the generic product-class values above.
Related cheat sheets and tools
Get depth and velocity from Manning's equation with n from the roughness card and geometry from the open-channel geometry card, then bring τd here. Size the stone with riprap sizing and the riprap methods card, bed the stone per filter criteria, and check the outlet with stilling basin and the hydraulic jump card. For full channel and watershed design, see HydroComplete.