All tools
Open bearing capacity calculator →

Unit Weights of Construction Materials — Reference

Dead-load and geotechnical unit weights in US customary (pcf) and SI (kN/m³). Conversion: 1 pcf = 0.1571 kN/m³.

Water & Fluids

MaterialpcfkN/m³
Fresh water62.49.81
Seawater64.010.05
Ice579.0

Structural Materials

MaterialpcfkN/m³
Concrete, plain (normalweight)14522.8
Concrete, reinforced15023.6
Concrete, structural lightweight90–11514–18
Steel49077.0
Aluminum165–17026–27
Timber, softwood (SYP, DF)32–375.0–5.8
Timber, hardwood40–476.3–7.4
Brick masonry120–13019–20
CMU, grouted solid (normalweight)135–14021–22
Asphalt pavement (HMA)140–14522–23
Glass16025.1

Soils & Aggregates (moist unless noted)

MaterialpcfkN/m³
Sand, loose, dry90–11014–17
Sand, compacted110–13017–20
Sand, saturated115–13518–21
Clay, soft100–12016–19
Clay, stiff115–13518–21
Silt100–12516–20
Gravel / sandy gravel, compacted120–14019–22
Crushed stone base (compacted)125–14520–23
Structural fill (typ. design value)12018.9
Rock, solid (granite, limestone)160–17025–27
Riprap / gabion stone, bulk (30–40% voids)100–12016–19
Topsoil80–10013–16
Buoyant unit weight.
γ′ = γsat − γw
Below the water table, effective (buoyant) unit weight drives effective stress: saturated sand at 125 pcf has γ′ = 125 − 62.4 ≈ 63 pcf — half the total. Using total instead of buoyant weight below the water table is one of the classic geotechnical calculation errors.

Sources: ASCE/SEI 7-22, Table C3.1-1a (materials). Das, B.M., Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (soils). Terzaghi & Peck, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. Ranges are handbook screening values; project-specific data governs final design.

Computing earth pressure? Rankine tool → · Footings? Bearing capacity · Gabions? Gabion wall stability. · Want the whole set? Print all 38 cards →

Worked example: effective stress with a water table

Vertical stress at 15 ft depth, water table at 5 ft, sand profile

Given moist sand γ = 115 pcf above the water table, saturated sand γsat = 125 pcf below, γw = 62.4 pcf
Find total stress, pore pressure, effective stress at 15 ft
Total stress σ = 5 × 115 + 10 × 125 = 575 + 1,250 = 1,825 psf
Pore pressure u = 10 ft of water × 62.4 = 624 psf
Effective stress σ′ = 1,825 − 624 = 1,201 psf
Same answer the buoyant way: 5 × 115 + 10 × (125 − 62.4) = 575 + 626 = 1,201 psf

Using the total stress instead of the effective stress overstates the stress that controls friction, bearing and settlement by 52% at this depth. Effective stress is what sets sliding resistance on a retaining wall base, skin friction on a pile and the consolidation load on a clay layer. The total-stress number looks reasonable on paper, which is why this mistake gets past review.

Common mistakes

When this card doesn’t apply

These are screening ranges from handbooks and ASCE 7 commentary. A geotechnical report’s measured unit weights replace them as soon as one exists. Organic soils, peat, collapsible loess and fills with debris fall outside these ranges and need laboratory values. For dead loads in structural design, ASCE/SEI 7 Table C3.1-1a and the manufacturer’s published weights for specific products govern.

Related cheat sheets and tools

Pair with the presumptive bearing values card for foundation screening, the exit gradient tool for buoyant-weight seepage checks, and the gravity dam stability tool where mass is the resistance.

Get future cheat sheets in your inbox

One reference card or worked-example case study per month, delivered the moment it's published. Free.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.