All tools
Open grain-size distribution tool →

Unified Soil Classification (USCS) — Reference

ASTM D2487 group symbols and names, the decision rules that produce them, and the AASHTO cross-walk. Everything below comes from two lab results: a sieve/hydrometer curve and the Atterberg limits. The symbol is not a soil property — it is a shorthand for a set of expected behaviors, listed at the bottom of the card.

The Two-Letter Code

First letter — dominant fractionSecond letter — modifier
G gravel · S sand · M silt · C clay · O organic · Pt peat W well graded · P poorly graded · M silty fines · C clayey fines · L low plasticity (LL < 50) · H high plasticity (LL ≥ 50)

Decision Sequence

> 50% retained on No. 200 → coarse-grained → > 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 → gravel, else sand
≥ 50% passing No. 200 → fine-grained → plasticity chart (LL vs. PI)

Sieve sizes that matter: No. 4 = 4.75 mm, No. 40 = 0.425 mm, No. 200 = 0.075 mm. Percent fines is percent passing the No. 200. Particles larger than 3 in. are excluded from the classification and reported separately as cobbles and boulders.

Coarse-Grained Soils (> 50% retained on No. 200)

SymbolGroup nameCriteria
GWWell-graded gravel< 5% fines; Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3
GPPoorly graded gravel< 5% fines; fails either Cu or Cc
GW-GM
GW-GC
Well-graded gravel with silt / with clay5–12% fines; meets GW gradation; fines plot below / above A-line
GP-GM
GP-GC
Poorly graded gravel with silt / with clay5–12% fines; fails GW gradation
GMSilty gravel> 12% fines; fines are ML or MH
GCClayey gravel> 12% fines; fines are CL or CH
GC-GMSilty, clayey gravel> 12% fines; fines are CL-ML
SWWell-graded sand< 5% fines; Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3
SPPoorly graded sand< 5% fines; fails either Cu or Cc
SW-SM
SW-SC
Well-graded sand with silt / with clay5–12% fines; meets SW gradation
SP-SM
SP-SC
Poorly graded sand with silt / with clay5–12% fines; fails SW gradation
SMSilty sand> 12% fines; fines are ML or MH
SCClayey sand> 12% fines; fines are CL or CH
SC-SMSilty, clayey sand> 12% fines; fines are CL-ML
Cu = D60 / D10      Cc = D30² / (D10 · D60)

Fine-Grained Soils (≥ 50% passing No. 200)

SymbolGroup nameCriteria (on the −No. 40 fraction)
CLLean clayLL < 50; PI > 7 and on or above A-line
MLSiltLL < 50; PI < 4 or below A-line
CL-MLSilty clayLL < 50; 4 ≤ PI ≤ 7 and on or above A-line
OLOrganic clay / organic siltLL (oven-dried) / LL (not dried) < 0.75
CHFat clayLL ≥ 50; on or above A-line
MHElastic siltLL ≥ 50; below A-line
OHOrganic clay / organic siltLL ≥ 50; oven-dried LL ratio < 0.75
PtPeatPrimarily organic matter, dark, organic odor — visual/manual
A-line: PI = 0.73 (LL − 20)      U-line: PI = 0.9 (LL − 8)

Plot the point (LL, PI). Above the A-line is clay, below is silt; LL = 50 splits L from H. A point above the U-line is an upper-bound violation — re-run the limits before you believe it. PI = LL − PL.

Group-Name Modifiers

ConditionAdd to the group name
Coarse-grained soil, 15% or more of the other coarse fraction“with gravel” / “with sand”
Fine-grained soil, 15–29% retained on No. 200“with sand” or “with gravel” (whichever is larger)
Fine-grained soil, ≥ 30% retained on No. 200“sandy” or “gravelly” prefix
Any soil with cobbles or boulders present“with cobbles” / “with boulders”

AASHTO M145 Cross-Walk (approximate)

AASHTODescriptionSubgrade ratingUsual USCS equivalents
A-1-aStone fragments, gravelExcellentGW, GP, GM
A-1-bCoarse sandExcellentSW, SP, GM, SM
A-3Fine sand, nonplasticExcellent to goodSP
A-2-4
A-2-5
Silty gravel & sandExcellent to goodGM, SM
A-2-6
A-2-7
Clayey gravel & sandGood to fairGC, SC
A-4Silt, LL ≤ 40, PI ≤ 10Fair to poorML, OL
A-5Elastic silt, LL > 40, PI ≤ 10Fair to poorMH, OH
A-6Clay, LL ≤ 40, PI > 10PoorCL
A-7-5
A-7-6
Clay, LL > 40, PI > 10PoorCH, OH
GI = (F − 35)[0.2 + 0.005(LL − 40)] + 0.01(F − 15)(PI − 10)

Group index, with F = percent passing No. 200. Report as a whole number in parentheses after the group, e.g. A-6(9); a negative result is reported as 0. AASHTO splits granular from silt-clay at 35% passing the No. 200 — not 50% — which is why the cross-walk above can only ever be approximate.

Typical Engineering Characteristics by Group

USCSγd,max
(pcf)
φ′
(deg)
DrainageValue as embankment / fill
GW125–13533–40ExcellentVery stable; shell and drainage zones
GP115–12532–38ExcellentReasonably stable; pervious shell
GM120–13530–35Fair to poorReasonably stable; impervious core if well compacted
GC115–13028–35PoorFairly stable; impervious core and blanket
SW110–13033–38ExcellentVery stable; shell and filter material
SP100–12030–36ExcellentReasonably stable when dense; liquefaction-prone if loose and saturated
SM110–12529–35Fair to poorFairly stable; erosion- and piping-sensitive — filter it
SC105–12527–34PoorFairly stable; usable core material
ML95–12026–32PoorPoor stability; frost-susceptible, highly erodible
CL95–12022–30Practically imperviousGood stability; standard core material
OL80–10020–28PoorNot suitable — strip it
MH70–9523–30PoorPoor stability; high shrink/swell and compressibility
CH75–10517–25Practically imperviousFair stability; expansive — watch slope movement
OH65–10015–25Practically imperviousNot suitable
PtNot suitable for any structural use

γd,max is standard Proctor (ASTM D698) maximum dry density; φ′ is the effective friction angle of compacted fill. Ranges are representative for preliminary work — site-specific testing governs final design.

The symbol is a starting point, not a design value. Two soils that both classify SM can differ by three orders of magnitude in permeability depending on how the fines are distributed. Classify to communicate and to bracket expectations; test to design. For embankment dams in particular, the piping and internal-erosion behavior of a SM/ML fill is governed by the gradation curve shape, not by the group symbol.

Sources: ASTM D2487, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System); ASTM D2488 (visual-manual). AASHTO M145 / ASTM D3282. Typical-property ranges after NAVFAC DM 7.01, Soil Mechanics, and USBR Design of Small Dams.

Have a sieve curve? Get D10/D30/D60, Cu and Cc · Foundation soil? Bearing capacity.

Related cheat sheets and tools

The group symbol drives most other lookups on this site: permeability on the hydraulic conductivity card, allowable bearing on the IBC 1806.2 card, unit weight on the unit weights card, and hydrologic soil group on the curve number card. Run the numbers with grain-size distribution, slope stability, or filter criteria. For full watershed and stormwater design, see HydroComplete.

Get future cheat sheets in your inbox

One reference card or worked-example case study per month, delivered the moment it's published. Free.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.